An anecdote preserved in the St. John family, sufficiently proves the slight regard he attached to that instrument which had produced such mighty effects in his hands. He was drinking_once in company with Ireton, Fleetwood, and St. John, great grandfather of the celebrated lord Bolingbroke; a bottle of wine was to be uncorked, and the corkscrew fell under the table; they all looked for it, and were unable to find it. In the mean time a deputation from the presbyterian churches waited in the anti-chamber, and an usher announced them. "Tell them," said Cromwell, "that I have retired, and that I am seeking the Lord." This was the expression employed by the fanatics for going to prayers. Having dismissed the troop of divines, he thus addressed his companions: "Those fellows think we are seeking the Lord, while we are only seeking a corkscrew." There is scarcely any example in Europe of a man who, from so low a beginning, raised himself to such eminence.* But with all his great talents, what did he consider absolutely essential to his happiness?-Power he obtained; but was he happy? He had lived in poverty and disquiet till the age of fortythree he afterwards plunged into blood, passed his life in trouble, and died prematurely, at the age of fifty-seven. With this life let any one compare that of a Newton, who lived fourscore years, always tranquil, always honoured, always the light of all thinking beings; beholding every day an accession to his fame, his character, his fortune; completely free both from care and remorse; and let him decide whose was the happier lot. O curas hominum! ô quantum est in rebus inanè! SECTION II. Oliver Cromwell was regarded with admiration by the puritans and independents of England: he is still * Napoleon Bonaparte has since become a still more striking example of similar exaltation.-T. their hero. But Richard Cromwell, his son, is the man for me. The first was a fanatic, who in the present day would be hissed down in the house of commons on uttering any one of the unintelligible absurdities which he delivered with such confidence before other fanatics, who listened to him with open mouth and staring eyes, in the name of the Lord.If he were to say that they must seek the Lord, and fight the battles of the Lordif he were to introduce the Jewish jargon into the parliament of England, to the eternal disgrace of the human understanding, he would be much more likely to be conducted to Bedlam than to be appointed the commander of armies. Brave he unquestionably was, and so are wolves: there are even some monkies as fierce as tigers. From a fanatic he became an able politician; in other words, from a wolf he became a fox, and the knave, craftily mounting from the first steps where the mad enthusiasm of the times had placed him, to the summit of greatness, walked over the heads of the prostrated fanatics. He reigned, but he lived in the horrors of alarm, and had neither cheerful days nor tranquil nights. The consolations of friendship and society never approached him. He died prematurely; more deserving, beyond a doubt, of public execution than the monarch whom, from a window of his own palace, he caused to be led out to the scaffold.* Richard Cromwell, on the contrary, was gentle and prudent, and refused to keep his father's power at the expense of the lives of three or four factious persons, whom he might have sacrificed to his ambition. He preferred becoming a private individual to being an assassin with supreme power. He relinquished the protectorship without regret, to live as a subject, and in the tranquillity of a country life, he enjoyed health and possessed his soul in peace for ninety years, Few Englishmen, who, after all, are the best judges of the errors and vices of Cromwell, would now pass so severe a sentence.-T. beloved by his neighbours, to whom he was a peacemaker and a father. Say, reader, had you to chuse between the destiny of the father and that of the son, which would you prefer? CUISSAGE. DION CASSIUS, that flatterer of Augustus and detractor from Cicero, because Cicero was the friend' of liberty that dry and diffuse writer, and gazetteer of popular rumours, Dion Cassius, reports that certain senators were of opinion that, in order to recompense Cæsar for all the evil which he had brought upon the commonwealth, it would be right, at the age of fifty-seven, to allow him to honour with his favours all the ladies who took his fancy. Men are still found who credit this absurdity. Even the author of the "Spirit of Laws" takes it for a truth, and speaks of it as of a decree which would have passed the Roman senate but for the modesty of the dictator, who suspected that he was not altogether prepared for the accession of so much good fortune. But if the Roman emperors attained not this right by a senatus-consultum, duly founded upon a plebiscitum, it is very likely that they fully enjoyed it by the courtesy of the ladies. The Marcus Aureliuses and the Julians, to be sure, exercised not this right, but all the rest extended it as widely as they were able. It is astonishing, that in Christian Europe a kind of feudal law for a long time existed, or at least it was deemed a customary usage, to regard the virginity of a female vassal as the property of the lord. The first night of the nuptials of the daughter of his vilain belonged to him without dispute. This right was established in the same manner as that of walking with a falcon on the fist, and of being saluted with incense at mass. The lords, indeed, did not enact that the wives of their vilains belonged to them; they confined themselves to the daughters; the reason of which is obvious. Girls are bashful, and sometimes might exhibit reluctance. This however yielded at once to the majesty of the laws, when the condescending baron deemed them worthy the honour of personally enforcing their practice. It is asserted that this curious jurisprudence commenced in Scotland; and I willingly believe that the Scotch lords had a still more absolute power over their clans than even the German and French barons over their vassals. It is undoubted that some abbots and bishops enjoyed this privilege in their quality of temporal lords; and it is not very long since that these prelates compounded their prerogative for acknowledgments in money, to which they have just as much right as to the virginity of the girls. But let it be well remarked, that this excess of tyranny was never sanctioned by any public law. If a lord or a prelate had cited before a regular tribunal a girl affianced to one of his vassals, in claim of her quit-rent, he would doubtless have lost his cause with costs. Let us seize this occasion to rest assured, that no partially-civilised people ever established formal laws against morals; I do not believe that a single instance of it can be furnished. Abuses creep in and are borne: they pass as customs, and travellers mistake them for fundamental laws. It is said that in Asia greasy Mahometan saints march in procession entirely naked, and that devout females crowd round them to kiss what is not worthy to be named; but I defy any one to discover a passage in the Koran which justifies this brutality. The phallum, which the Egyptians carry in procession, may be quoted, in order to confound me, as well as the idol Jaggernaut, of the Indians. I reply, that these ceremonies war no more against morals than circumcision at the age of eight days. In some of our towns the holy foreskin has been borne in procession; and it is preserved yet in certain sacristies, without this piece of drollery causing the least disturbance in families. Still, I am convinced that no council or act of parliament ever ordained this homage to the holy foreskin. I call a public law which deprives me of my property, which takes away my wife and gives her to another, a law against morals; and I am certain that such a law is impossible. Some travellers maintain that in Lapland husbands, out of politeness, make an offer of their wives. Out of still greater politeness, I believe them; but I nevertheless assert, that they never found this rule of good manners in the legal code of Lapland, any more than in the constitutions of Germany, in the ordinances of the kings of France, or in the "Statutes at Large" of England, any positive law adjudging the right of cuissage to the barons. Absurd and barbarous laws may be found every where; formal laws against morals nowhere. CURATE (OF THE COUNTRY.)* A CURATE—but why do I say a curate?—even an iman, a talapoin, or bramin, ought to have the means of living decently. The priest, in every country, ought to be supported by the altar, since he serves the public. Some fanatic rogue may assert, that I place the curate and the bramin on the same level, and associate truth with imposture; but I compare only the services rendered to society, the labour and the recompense. I maintain, that whoever exercises a laborious function ought to be well paid by his fellow citizens. I do not assert that he ought to amass riches, sup with Lucullus, or be as insolent as Clodius. I pity the case of a country curate, who is obliged to dispute a sheaf of corn with his parishioner; to plead against him; to exact from him the tenth of his peas and beans; to be hated and to hate; and to consume his * Anglice, country rector. The original term is preserved in the original alphabetical order, because the illustration is chiefly French. VOL. II. 2 H |