« AnteriorContinuar »
DOVERNMENT, at first, was either pa
U triarchal or military ; that of a parent over his family, or of a commander over his fellow warriors.
I. Paternal authority, and the order of domestic life, supplied the foundation of civil government. Did mankind spring out of the earth mature and independent, it would be found perhaps impossible, to introduce subjection and subordination among them; but the condition of human infancy prepares men for society, by combining individuals into small communities, and by placing them from the beginning under direction and control. A family contains the rudiments of an empire. The authority of one over many, and the disposition to govern and to be governed, are in this way incidental to the very nature, and coeval, no doubt, with the existence of the human species. Moreover, the constitution of families, not only assists the formation of civil government, by the dispositions which it generates, but also furnishes the first steps of the process by which empires have been actually reared. A parent would retain a considerable part of his authority after his children were grown up, and had formed families of their own. The obedience, of which they remembered not the beginning, would be considered as natural ; and would scarcely, during the parent's life, be entirely or abruptly withdrawn. Here then we see the second stage in the progress of dominion. The first was, that of a parent over his young children: this that of an ancestor presiding over his adult descendants.
Although the original progenitor was the centre of union to his pofterity, yet it is not probable that the association would be immediately or altogether dissolved by his death. Connected by habits of intercourse and affection, and by some common rights, necessities and interests, they would consider themselves as allied to each other in a nearer degree than to the rest of the species. Almost all would be sensible of an inclination to continue in the society in which they had been brought up; and experiencing, as they soon would do, many incon- ? veniencies from the absence of that authority which their common ancestor exercised, especially in deciding their disputes, and directing their operations in matters in which it was neces sary to act in conjunction, they might be induced to supply his place by a formal choice of a successor, or rather might willingly, and almost imperceptibly, transfer their obedience to some' one of the family, who by his age or services, : or by the part he possessed in the direction of their affairs during the life-time of the parent, had already taught them to respect his advice, or to attend to his commands; or lastly, the prospect of these inconveniencies might prompt the first ancestor to appoint a fucceffor, and his ; VOL. II.
posterity, from the same motive united with an habitual deference to the ancestor's authority, might receive the appointment with submission. Here then we have a tribe or clan incorporated under one chief. Such communities might be increased by considerable numbers, and fulfil the purposes of civil union without any other or more regular convention, constitution, or form of government, than what we have described. Every branch which was flipped off from the primitive stock, and removed to a distance from it, would in like manner take root, and grow into a separate clan. Two or three of these clans were frequently, we may fuppose, united into one. Marriage, conquest, mutual defence, common distress, or more accidental coalitions, might produce this effect.
II. A second source of personal authority, and which might easily extend, or sometimes perhaps supersede the patriarchal, is that, which results from military arrangement. In wars, either of aggression or defence, manifest neceffity would prompt those who fought on the fame side to array themselves under one leader. And although their leader was advanced to this eminence for the purpose only, and during the operations of a single expedition, yet his authority
would not always terminate with the reasons for which it was conferred. A warrior who had led forth his tribe against their enemies with repeated success, would procure to himself even in the deliberations of peace, a powerful and permanent influence. If this advantage were added to the authority of the patriarchal chief, or favoured by any previous distinction of ancestry, it would be no difficult undertaking for the person who possessed it to obtain the almost absolute direction of the affairs of the community, especially if he was careful to associate to himself proper auxiliaries, and content to practise the obvious art of gratifying or removing those who opposed his pretensions.
But although we may be able to comprehend how by his personal abilities or fortune one man may obtain the rule over many, yet it seems more difficult to explain how empire became hereditary, or in what manner sovereign power, which is never acquired without great merit or management, learns to descend in a succession, which has no dependence upon any qualities, either of understanding, or activity. The causes which have introduced hereditary dominion into fo general a reception in the world, are principally the following the influence of association, I 2