Good to Eat: Riddles of Food and Culture
Simon and Schuster, 1985 - 289 páginas
The anthropologist/author takes on some of the major food riddles, including cannibalism, to reveal why a culture accepts or spurns specific foods
Resultados 1-3 de 57
In the case of Hindu India , as we shall see , the ecological impracticality of meat
production so far outweighs the nutritional benefits of carnivory that meat is
avoided — bad to eat , and therefore bad to think . An important point to bear in
nutritional status of pregnant and lactating women . To quote from a popular
textbook , “ protein needs increase during pregnancy , yet repeatedly we have
found taboos , superstitions , and prohibitions that serve to eliminate or reduce ...
Development and the Problems of Village Nutrition . Montclair , N . J . : Allenheld
... Nutrition Reviews 35 : 321 – 37 . Sherratt , Andrew . 1981 . ... In Lactose
Digestion : Clinical and Nutritional Implications , ed . David Paige and T . Bayless
, 23 ...
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
Good to eat: riddles of food and cultureCrítica de los usuarios - Not Available - Book Verdict
Why are the world's food habits or "foodways,'' as Harris refers to them, so diverse? In this scholarly yet fast-paced and very readable work, anthropologist Harris argues that "major differences in ... Leer comentario completo
ONE Good to Think or Good to Eat?
TWO Meat Hunger
THREE The Riddle of the Sacred
Derechos de autor
Otras 11 secciones no mostradas