Good to Eat: Riddles of Food and Culture
Simon and Schuster, 1985 M01 1 - 289 páginas
The anthropologist/author takes on some of the major food riddles, including cannibalism, to reveal why a culture accepts or spurns specific foods
Resultados 1-3 de 43
Preferred foods (good to eat) are foods that have a more favorable balance of
practical benefits over costs than foods that are avoided (bad to eat). Even for an
omnivore it makes sense not to eat everything that one can digest. Some foods
An important point to bear in mind is that nutritional and ecological costs and
benefits are not always the same as monetary — "dollars-and-cents" — costs and
benefits. In market economies such as the United States, good to eat may mean ...
I shall not argue that avoidance represents an optimization of practical costs and
benefits, since I am not prepared to weigh the costs of dying prematurely with
xerophthalmia against the cost of dying prematurely without xerophthalmia.
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
Good to eat: riddles of food and cultureCrítica de los usuarios - Not Available - Book Verdict
Why are the world's food habits or "foodways,'' as Harris refers to them, so diverse? In this scholarly yet fast-paced and very readable work, anthropologist Harris argues that "major differences in ... Leer comentario completo
ONE Good to Think or Good to Eat?
TWO Meat Hunger
THREE The Riddle of the Sacred Cow
Derechos de autor
Otras 10 secciones no mostradas