Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

should be destroyed: but their penitence afterwards obtained from him a more merciful sentence. By the mouth of Isaiah he denounced death to Hezekiah; (p) which the prayers and tears of that monarch moved him to defer. (9) Hence many persons argue, that God hath not fixed the affairs of men by an eternal decree; but that every year, day, and hour, he decrees one thing or another, according to the respective merits of each individual, or to his own ideas of equity and justice. With regard to repentance, we must not admit that it can happen to God, any more than ignorance, or error, or impotence. For if no man knowingly and willingly lays himself under the necessity of repentance, we cannot attribute repentance to God, without saying, either that he is ignorant of the future, or that he cannot avoid it, or that he precipitately and inconsiderately adopts a resolution, of which he immediately repents. But that is so far from the meaning of the Holy Spirit, that in the very mention of repentance, he denies that it can belong to God, because "he is not a man, that he should repent." (r) And it must be remarked, that both these points are so connected in the same chapter, that a comparison fully reconciles the apparent inconsistency. Where it is said that God repented of having created Saul king, the change declared to have taken place is figurative. It is almost immediately added, that "The strength of Israel will not lie nor repent: for he is not a man that he should repent." (s) In which, without any, figure, his immutability is plainly asserted. It is certain, therefore, that the ordination of God in the administra tion of human affairs, is perpetual and superior to all repentance. And to place his constancy beyond all doubt, even his adversaries have been constrained to attest it. For Balaam, notwithstanding his reluctance, was obliged to break out into the following exclamation: "God is not a man, that he should lie: neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?" (t)

XIII. How then, it will be inquired, is the term repentanee to be understood, when attributed to God? I reply, In the

(p) Isaiah xxxviii. 1, 5.
(8) 1 Sam. xv. 29.

VOL. I.

(q) 2 Kings xx. 1, 5. (r) 1 Sam. xv. 29.
(t) Numb. xxiii. 19.

2 H

same manner as all the other forms of expression, which describe God to us after the manner of men. For since our infirmity cannot reach his sublimity, the description of him which is given to us, in order that we may understand it, must be lowered to the level of our capacity. His method of lowering it is to represent himself to us, not as he is in himself, but according to our perception of him. Though he is free from all perturbation of mind, he declares that he is angry with sinners. () As therefore when we hear that God is angry, we ought not to imagine any commotion in him, but rather to consider this expression as borrowed from our perception, because God carries the appearance of one who is very angry, whenever he executes judgment: so neither by the term repentance ought we to understand any thing but a change of actions; because men are accustomed to express their dissatisfaction with themselves by changing their actions. Since every change among men therefore is a correction of that which displeases them, and correction proceeds from repentance; therefore the term repentance is used to signify that God makes a change in his works. Yet at the same time, there is no alteration in his counsel or his will, nor any change in his affections; but how sudden soever the variation may appear to the eyes of men, he perpetually and regularly prosecutes what he hath foreseen, approved, and decreed from eternity.

XIV. Nor does the Sacred History, when it records the remission of the destruction which had just been denounced against the Ninevites, and the prolongation of the life of Hezekiah after he had been threatened with death, prove that there was any abrogation of the Divine decrees. Persons who thus understand it, are deceived in their ideas of the threatenings: which, though expressed in the form of simple declarations, yet, as the event shews, contain in them a tacit condition. For why did God send Jonah to the Ninevites, to predict the ruin of their city? Why did he, by the mouth of Isaiah, warn Hezekiah of death? He could have destroyed both them and him, without previously announcing their end. He had some other object in view therefore, than to forewarn

(v) Psalm vii. 11.

them of their death and to give them a distant prospect of its approach. And that was not to destroy them, but to reform them, that they might not be destroyed. Therefore the prediction of Jonah, that after forty days Nineveh should fall, was uttered to prevent its fall. Hezekiah was deprived of the hope of a longer life, in order that he might obtain a prolongation of it in answer to his prayers. Now who does not see, that the Lord by such denunciations as these intended to arouse to repentance the persons whom he thus alarmed, that they might escape the judgment which their sins had deserved? If this be admitted, the nature of the circumstances leads to the conclusion, that we must understand a tacit condition implied in the simple denunciation. This is also confirmed by similar examples. The Lord, reprehending king Abimelech for having deprived Abraham of his wife, uses these words; “ Behold, thou art but a dead man, for the woman which thou hast taken; for she is a man's wife." But after Abimelech has excused himself, the Lord speaks in this manner: "Restore the man his wife; for he is a prophet, and he shall pray for thee, and thou shalt live: and if thou restore-her not, know thou that thou shalt surely die, thou, and all that are thine." (w) You see, how by the first declaration God terrifies his mind, to dispose him to make satisfaction; but in the next, he makes an explicit declaration of his will. Since other passages are to be explained in a similar manner, you must not infer that there is any abrogation of a prior purpose of the Lord, because he may have annulled some former declarations. For God rather prepares the way for his eternal ordination, when by a denunciation of punishment he calls to repentance those whom he designs to spare, than makes any variation in his will, or even in his declarations, except that he does not syllabically express, what nevertheless is easily understood. For that assertion of Isaiah must remain true; "The Lord of hosts hath purposed, and who shall disannul it? and his hand is stretched out, and who shall turn it back." (x)

[blocks in formation]

CHAPTER XVIII.

God uses the Agency of the Impious, and inclines their Minds to execute his Judgments, yet without the least Stain of his perfect Purity.

A QUESTION of greater difficulty arises from other passages, where God is said to incline or draw, according to his own pleasure, Satan himself and all the reprobate. For the carnal understanding scarcely comprehends how he, acting by their means, can contract no defilement from their criminality, and even in operations common to himself and them be free from every fault, and yet righteously condemn those whose ministry he uses. Hence was invented the distinction between doing and permitting; because to many persons this has appeared an inexplicable difficulty, that Satan and all the impious are subject to the power and government of God, so that he directs their malice to whatever end he pleases, and uses their crimes for the execution of his judgments. The modesty of those who are alarmed at the appearance of absurdity, might perhaps be excusable, if they did not attempt to vindicate the Divine justice from all accusation by a pretence utterly destitute of any foundation in truth. They consider it absurd, that a man should be blinded by the will and command of God, and afterwards be punished for his blindness. They therefore endeavour to evade the difficulty, by alleging that it happens only by the permission, and not by the will of God; but God himself, by the most unequivocal declarations, rejects this subterfuge. That men however can effect nothing but by the secret will of God, and can deliberate on nothing but what he hath previously decreed and determines by his secret direction, is proved by express and innumerable testimonies. What we have before cited from the Psalmist, that "God hath done whatsoever he hath pleased," (y) undoubtedly pertains to all the actions of men. If God be the certain arbiter of war and peace, as is there affirmed, and that

(y) Psalm cxv. 3.

without any exception, who will venture to assert, that he remains ignorant and unconcerned respecting men, while they are actuated by the blind influence of chance? But this subject will be better elucidated by particular examples. From the first chapter of Job we know, that Satan presents himself before God to receive his commands, as well as the angels who yield a spontaneous obedience. It is indeed in a different manner, and for a different end; yet he cannot attempt any thing but by the Divine will. Although he seems to obtain only a bare permission to afflict that holy man; yet since this sentence is true, "The Lord gave, and the Lord hath taken away," (z) we conclude that God was the author of that trial, of which Satan and mischievous robbers and assassins were the immediate agents. Satan endeavours to drive him by desperation into madness. The Sabeans in a predatory incursion cruelly and wickedly seize upon property not their own. Job acknowledges that he was stripped of all his wealth and reduced to poverty, because such was the will of God. Therefore whatever is attempted by men, or by Satan himself, God still holds the helm to direct all their attempts to the execution of his judgments. God intends the deception of that perfidious king, Ahab; the devil offers his service for that purpose; he is sent with a positive commission to be a lying spirit in the mouth of all the prophets. (a) If the blinding and infatuation of Ahab be a divine judgment, the pretence of bare permission disappears. For it would be ridiculous for a judge merely to permit, without decreeing what should be done, and commanding his officers to execute it. The Jews designed to destroy Christ; Pilate and his soldiers complied with their outrageous violence; yet the disciples in a solemn prayer confess that all the impious did nothing but what "the hand and the counsel of God determined before to be done;" (b) agreeably to what Peter had already preached, that he was "delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God," that he might be "crucified and slain." (c) As though he had said that God, who saw every thing from the beginning, with a clear knowledge and determined will, appointed what the Jews executed; as he men

[blocks in formation]
« AnteriorContinuar »