tions in another place, "Those things, which God before had shewed by the mouth of all his prophets, that Christ should suffer, he hath so fulfilled." (c) Absalom, defiling his father's bed with incest, perpetrated a detestable crime: yet God pronounces that this was his work: for his words are, "Thou didst it secretly: but I will do this thing before all Israel, and before the sun." (d) Whatever cruelty the Chaldeans exercised in Judea, Jeremiah pronounces to be the work of God. (e) For which reason Nebuchadnezzar is called the servant of God. God frequently proclaims, that the impious are excited to war by his hissing, by the sound of his trumpet, by his influence, and by his command: he calls the Assyrian the rod of his anger, and the staff which he moves with his hand. The destruction of the holy city, and the ruin of the temple he calls his own work. (ƒ) David, not murmuring against God, but acknowledging him to be a righteous Judge, confesses the maledictions of Shimei to proceed from his command. "The Lord," says he, "hath said unto him, Curse." (g) It often occurs in the Sacred History, that whatever comes to pass proceeds from the Lord; as the defection of the ten tribes, (h) the death of the sons of Eli, (¿) and many events of a similar kind. Those who are but moderately acquainted with the Scriptures will perceive that, for the sake of brevity, out of a great number of testimonies, I have produced only a few; which nevertheless abundantly evince how nugatory and insipid it is, instead of the providence of God, to substitute a bare permission: as though God were sitting in a watch-tower, expecting fortuitous events, and so his decisions were dependent on the will of men. II. With respect to his secret influences, the declaration of Solomon concerning the heart of a king, that it is inclined hither or thither, according to the divine will, (k) certainly extends to the whole human race, and is as much as though he had said, that whatever conceptions we form in our minds, they are directed by the secret inspiration of God. And certainly, (c) Acts iii. 18. (g) 2 Sam. xvi. 10. () 1 Sam. ii. 34. (d) 2 Sam. xii. 12. xvi. 22. (k) Prov. xxi. 1. if he did not operate internally on the human mind, there would be no propriety in asserting, that he causeth "the wisdom of the wise to perish, and the understanding of the prudent to be hid; that he poureth contempt upon princes, and causeth them to wander in the wilderness, where there is no way." (1) And to this alludes, what we frequently read, that men are timorous, as their hearts are possessed with his fear. (m) Thus David departed from the camp of Saul, without the knowledge of any one; "because a deep sleep from the Lord was fallen upon them all." (n) But nothing can be desired more explicit than his frequent declarations, that he blinds the minds of men, strikes them with giddiness, inebriates them with the spirit of slumber, fills them with infatuation, and hardens their hearts. (0) These passages also many persons refer to permission, as though, in abandoning the reprobate, God permitted them to be blinded by Satan. But that solution is too frivolous, since the Holy Spirit expressly declares that their blindness and infatuation are inflicted by the righteous judgment of God. He is said to have caused the obduracy of Pharaoh's heart, and also to have aggravated and confirmed it. Some elude the force of these expressions with a foolish cavil; that, since Pharoah himself is elsewhere said to have hardened his own heart, his own will is stated as the cause of his obduracy. As though these two things were at all incompatible with each other, that man should be actuated by God, and yet at the same time be active himself. But I retort on them their own objection; for if hardening denotes a bare permission, Pharoah cannot properly be charged with being the cause of his own obstinacy. Now how weak and insipid would be such an interpretation, as though Pharoah only permitted himself to be hardened. Besides the Scripture cuts off all occasion for such cavils. God says, "I will harden his heart." (p) So also Moses says, concerning the inhabitants of Canaan, that they marched forth to battle, because the Lord had hardened their hearts; (9) which is likewise repeated by another Prophet; "He turned their hearts to hate his people." (r) Thus also, in Isaiah, he (1) Isaiah xxix. 14. Psalm cvii. 40. Ezek. vii. 26. (m) Lev. xxvi. 36. Exod. viii, 15. (r) Psalm cv. 25. declares that he will "send the Assyrians against an hypocritical nation, and will give him a charge to take the spoil, and to take the prey:" (s) not that he meant to teach impious and refractory men a voluntary obedience, but because he would incline them to execute his judgments, just as if they had his commands engraven on their minds. Hence it appears that they were impelled by the positive appointment of God. I grant indeed, that God often actuates the reprobate by the interposition of Satan; but in such a manner that Satan himself acts his part by the Divine impulse, and proceeds to the extent of the Divine appointment. Saul was disturbed by an evil spirit; but it is said to be "from the Lord;" (t) to teach us that Saul's madness proceeded from the righteous vengeance of God. Satan is also said to blind "the minds of them which believe not;" (u) but the strength of the delusion proceeds from God himself, “that they should believe a lie, who believe not the truth." (v) According to one view of the subject, it is said, "If the prophet be deceived when he hath spoken a thing, I the Lord have deceived that prophet." (w) But according to another, God is said himself to "give men over to a reprobate mind," (x) and to the vilest lusts: because he is the principal author of his own righteous vengeance, and Satan is only the dispenser of it. But as we must discuss this subject again in the Second Book, where we shall treat of the freedom or slavery of the human will, I think I have now said in a brief manner as much as the occasion required. The whole may be summed up thus; that as the will of God is said to be the cause of all things, his providence is established as the governor in all the counsels and works of men, so that it not only exerts its power in the elect, who are influenced by the Holy Spirit, but also compels the compliance of the repro bate. III. But as I have hitherto only recited such things as are delivered without any obscurity or ambiguity in the Scriptures, let persons who hesitate not to brand with ignominy those oracles of heaven, beware what kind of opposition they make. For if they pretend ignorance, with a desire to be commended (s) Isaiah x. 6. (t) 1 Sam. xvi. 14. (u) 2 Cor. iv. 4. for their modesty, what greater instance of pride can be conceived, than to oppose one little word to the authority of God; as, "it appears otherwise to me," or, "I would rather not meddle with this subject." But if they openly censure, what will they gain by their puny attempts against heaven? Their petulance indeed is no novelty, for in all ages there have been impious and profane men, who have virulently opposed this doctrine. But they shall feel the truth of what the Spirit long ago declared by the mouth of David, that God "is clear when he judgeth." (y) David obliquely hints at the madness of men who display such excessive presumption amidst their insignificance, as not only to dispute against God, but to arrogate to themselves the power of condemning him. In the mean time, he briefly suggests, that God is unaffected by all the blasphemies which they discharge against heaven, but that he dissipates the mists of calumny, and illustriously displays his righteousness: our faith also, being founded on the Divine word, (z) and therefore superior to all the world, from its exaltation looks down with contempt upon those mists. For their first objection, that if nothing happens but by the will of God, he has in him two contrary wills, because he decrees in his secret counsel what he hath publicly prohibited in his law, is easily refuted. But before I reply, I wish the reader again to be apprised, that this cavil is directed, not against me, but against the Holy Spirit, who dictated to the pious Job this confession, that what had befallen him had happened according to the Divine will: when he had been plundered by banditti, he acknowledged in their injuries the righteous scourge of God. (a) What says the Scripture in another case? "They," the sons of Eli, "hearkened not unto the voice of their father, because the Lord would slay them." (b) The Psalmist also exclaims, that "God," who "is in the heavens, hath done whatsoever he hath pleased." (c) And now I have sufficiently proved, that God is called the Author of all those things, which, according to the system of these censors, happen only by his uninfluential permission. He declares that he creates light and darkness, that he forms good and evil: (d) and that no evil occurs, which he hath not performed. Let them say then, whether he exercises his judgments voluntarily or involuntarily. But as Moses suggests, that he who is killed by the fortuitous fall of an axe, is delivered by God to the stroke: (e) so, in the Acts, the whole Church asserts that Herod and Pilate conspired to do what the hand and the counsel of God had predetermined. (ƒ) And indeed, unless the crucifixion of Christ was according to the will of God, what becomes of our redemption? Yet the will of God is neither repugnant to itself, nor subject to change, nor chargeable with pretending to dislike what it approves: but whilst in him it is uniform and simple, it wears to us the appearance of variety; because the weakness of our understanding comprehends not how the same thing may be in different respects both agreeable to his will, and contrary to it. Paul, after having said that the vocation of the Gentiles was a hidden mystery, adds, that it contained a manifestation of the manifold wisdom of God. (g) Now because, through the dulness of our capacity, the Divine wisdom appears to us manifold (or multiform, as it has been translated by an ancient interpreter), shall we therefore dream of any vanity in God himself, as though his counsels were mutable, or his thoughts contradictory to each other? Rather, while we comprehend not how God intends that to be done, the doing of which he forbids, let us remember our imbecility, and at the same time consider, that the light which he inhabits, is justly called inaccessible, (h) because it is overspread with impenetrable darkness. Therefore all pious and modest men will easily acquiesce in this opinion of Augustine: "That a man may sometimes choose with a good intention, that which is not agreeable to the will of God; as, if a good son wishes his father to live, whilst God determines that he shall die. It is also possible for a man to will with a bad design, what God wills with a good one; as, if a bad son wishes his father to die, which is also the will of God. Now the former wishes what is not agreeable, the latter what is agreeable, to the Divine will. And yet the filial affection of the former is more consonant to the righteous will of God, than the want of natural affection |