Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

maxim with us, that whatever be the character of a man, yet we ought to love him because we love God.

LVI. Wherefore the schoolmen have discovered either their ignorance or their wickedness in a most pestilent manner, when, treating of the precepts prohibiting the desire of revenge, and enjoining the love of our enemies, which were anciently delivered to all the Jews, and afterwards equally to all Christians, they have made them to be counsels which we are at liberty to obey or not to obey, and have confined the necessary observance of them to the monks, who on account of this very circumstance would be more righteous than plain Christians, because they voluntarily bound themselves to observe these counsels. The reason which they assign for not receiving them as laws, is, that they appear too burdensome and grievous, especially to Christians who are under the law of grace. Do they presume in this manner to disannul the eternal law of God respecting the love of our neighbour? Is such a distinction to be found in any page of the law? On the contrary, does it not abound with commandments most strictly enjoining the love of our enemies? For what is the meaning of the injunction to feed our neighbour when he is hungry? (b) to direct into the right way his oxen or his asses when they are going astray, and to help them when sinking under a burden? (c) Shall we do good to his cattle for his sake, and feel no benevolence to his person? What! is not the word of the Lord eternal? "Vengeance is mine, I will repay." (d) Which is expressed in another passage still more explicitly: "Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people." (e) Let them either obliterate these passages from the law, or acknowledge that the Lord was a legislator, and no longer falsely pretend that he was only a counsellor.

LVII. And what is the meaning of the following expressions which they have presumed to abuse by the absurdity of their comment? "Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despite

(b) Prov. xxv. 21.
(d) Rom. xii. 19.

(c) Exod. xxiii. 4, 5.
(e) Lev. xix. 18.

fully use you, and persecute you; that ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven." (f) Here, who would not argue with Chrysostom, that the allegation of such a necessary cause clearly proves these to be, not exhortations, but commandments? What have we left us, after being expunged from the number of the children of God? But according to them, the monks will be the only sons of the heavenly Father; they alone will venture to invoke God as their Father. What will now become of the Church? Upon the same principle it will be confined to heathens and publicans. For Christ says, "If ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same?" (g) Shall not we be in a happy situation, if they leave us the title of Christians, but deprive us of the inheritance of the kindom of heaven? The argument of Augustine is equally strong. When the Lord, says he, prohibits adultery, he forbids you to violate the wife of your enemy no less than of your friend: when he prohibits theft, he permits you not to steal from any one, whether he be a friend or an enemy. Now Paul reduces these two prohibitions of theft and adultery to the rule of love, and even teaches that they are "briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself." (h) Either then Paul must have been an erroneous expositor of the law, or it necessarily follows from this, that we are commanded to love, not only our friends, but also our enemies. Those therefore, who so licentiously shake off the yoke of the children of God, evidently betray themselves to be the sons of Satan. It is doubtful whether they have discovered greater stupidity or impudence in the publication of this dogma. For all the Fathers decidedly pronounce that these are pure precepts. That no doubt was entertained on the subject in the time of Gregory appears from his positive assertions, for he treats them as precepts, as though it had never been controverted. And how foolishly do they argue? They would be a burden, say they, too grievous for Christians. As though truly any thing could be conceived more difficult, than to love God with all our heart, with all our soul, and with all our strength. Compared

(ƒ) Matt. v. 44, 45.

(g) Matt. v. 46.

() Rom. xiii. 9.

with this law every thing must be accounted easy, whether it be to love an enemy, or to banish from the mind all desire of revenge. To our imbecility, indeed, every thing is arduous and difficult, even the smallest point in the law. It is the Lord in whom we find strength: let him give what he commands, and let him command what he pleases. The state of Christians under the law of grace consists not in unbounded license uncontrolled by any law, but in being ingrafted into Christ, by whose grace they are delivered from the curse of the law, and by whose Spirit they have the law inscribed on their hearts. This grace Paul has figuratively denominated a law, in allusion to the law of God, to which he was comparing and contrasting it. Their dispute concerning the word law is a dis pute about nothing.

LVIII. Of the same nature is what they have called venial sin; a term which they apply to secret impiety which is a breach of the first table, and to the direct transgression of the last commandment. For this is their definition, that "it is evil desire without any deliberate assent, and without any long continuance in the heart." Now I assert that evil desire cannot enter the heart, except through a deficiency of those things which the law requires. We are forbidden to have any strange gods. When the mind, assaulted by mistrust, looks around to some other quarter, when it is stimulated by a sudden desire of transferring its happiness from God to some other being; whence proceed these emotions, however transient, but from the existence of some vacuum in the soul to receive such temptations? And not to protract this argument to greater length, we are commanded to love God with all our heart, with all our mind, and with all our soul: therefore unless all the powers our soul be intensely engaged in the love of God, we have already departed from the obedience required by the law: for that the dominion of God is not well established in our conscience, is evident, from the enemies that there rebel against his government, and interrupt the execu tion of his commands. That the last commandment properly belongs to this point, has been already demonstrated. Have we felt any evil desire in our heart? we are already guilty of concupiscence, and are become at once transgressors of the law;

because the Lord forbids us, not only to plan and attempt any thing that would prove detrimental to another, but even to be stimulated and agitated with concupiscence. Now the curse of God always rests on the transgression of the law. We have no reason therefore to exempt even the most trivial emotions of concupiscence from the sentence of death. "In determining the nature of different sins," says Augustine, “let us not use deceitful balances, to weigh what we please and how we please, according to our own humour, saying, This is heavy, This is light: but let us borrow the divine balance from the holy Scriptures, as from the treasury of the Lord, and therein weigh what is heavy; or rather let us weigh nothing ourselves, but acknowledge the weight already deter mined by the Lord." And what says the Scripture? The assertion of Paul, that "the wages of sin is death," (i) sufficiently demonstrates this groundless distinction to have been unknown to him. As we have already too strong a propensity to hypocrisy, this opiate ought by no means to have been added to lull our consciences into greater insensibility.

LIX. I wish these persons would consider the meaning of this declaration of Christ: "Whosoever shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven." (k) Are not they of this number, who thus presume to extenuate the transgression of the law, as though it were not worthy of death? But they ought to consider, not merely what is commanded, but who it is that gives the commands; because the smallest transgression of the law, which he has given, is a derogation from his authority. Is the violation of the Divine majesty in any case a trivial thing in their estimation? Lastly, if God has declared his will in the law, whatever is contrary to the law displeases him. Will they pretend that the wrath of God is so debilitated and disarmed, that the punishment of death cannot immediately follow? He hath unequivocally declared, if they could induce themselves to listen to his voice, rather than obscure the plain truth with their frivolous subtleties: "The soul that sinneth, it shall die:" (1) and, which I have before

(i) Rom. vi. 23. VOL. I.

(A) Matt. v. 19.
3 L

(1) Ezek. xviii. 20.

cited, "The wages of sin is death." (m) They acknowledge it to be sin, because it is impossible to deny it, yet they contend that it is not mortal sin. But, as they have hitherto too much resigned themselves to infatuation, they should at length learn to return to the exercise of their reason. If they persevere in their dreams, we will take our leave of them. Let the children of God know that all sin is mortal; because it is a rebellion against the will of God, which necessarily provokes his wrath; because it is a transgression of the law, against which the Divine judgment is universally denounced: and that the offences of the saints are venial, not of their own nature, but because they obtain pardon through the mercy of God.

CHAPTER IX.

Christ, though known to the Jews under the Law, yet clearly revealed only in the Gospel.

As it was not without reason, or without effect, that God was pleased in ancient times to manifest himself as a Father by means of expiations and sacrifices, and consecrated to himself a chosen people; there is no doubt that he was known even then in the same image in which he now appears to us with meridian splendour. Therefore Malachi, after having enjoined the Jews to attend to the law of Moses, and to persevere in the observance of it (because after his death there was to be an interruption of the prophetical office) immediately announces, that "the Sun of righteousness shall arise." (n) In this language he suggests, that the law tended to excite in the pious an expectation of the Messiah that was to come, and that at his advent there was reason to hope for a much greater degree of light. For this reason Peter says that "the prophets have inquired and searched diligently concerning the salvation" which is now manifested in the Gospel; and that "it was revealed to them, that not unto themselves, but unto

[blocks in formation]
« AnteriorContinuar »