« AnteriorContinuar »
The Obje&tions of the Diffenting Ministers against Episcopal
An Obj. from the Comprehensiveness of the required De-
from p. 30. to p. 36.
2. That St. Paul saith nothing against such Impositions in
The Third of the Scrupled Terms of Ministerial Confora
mity, viz. The Oath of Canonical Obedience, and the
'TH E Design of this part proposed, viz.
II. To the Arguments proposed in Defence of the Pube.
lick Ministry of the Diflenters.
p. 1, 2, 3.
All the Arguments proposed in Defence of their Publick
3: Arg. taken from the Caufe in which the Disenting Mi.