OF

CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE

OF THE

STATE OF INDIANA,

WITH TABLES OF THE CASES REPORTED AND CASES
CITED AND AN INDEX.

BY AUGUSTUS N. MARTIN,

OFFICIAL REPORTER.

VOL. LIX.

CONTAINING CASES DECIDED AT THE NOVEMBER TERM, 1877,
NOT REPORTED IN VOLS. LVII. AND LVIII.

OHIO STATE
UNIVERSITY

INDIANAPOLIS :

THE BOWEN-MERRILL COMPANY.

1893.

Entered, according to the act of Congress, in the year 1878, by

AUGUSTUS N. MARTIN,

In the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D.C.

STAT: SHO

ELECTROTYPED AT THE

INDIANAPOLIS ELECTROTYPE

FOUNDRY.

KETCHUM & WANAMAKER.

70 Campbell, Turner v.. .279 Caress, Nicholson et al. v........... 39 ..540 Chancey, Meredith v.... .466 Chandler et al., Rennick et al. v..354 Chrisman v. Tuttle et al.............155 .400 City of Aurora et al.v. Lamar et al.400 292 City of Evansville v. Thayer et al.324 City of Logansport et al.v. Seybold.225 City of New Albany et al., Collins

..303

247

Bailey et al. v. Boyd.
Ballinger, Hiatt v........
Baltimore, Pittsburgh and Chica-
go R. W. Co. v. Johnson.........188
Baltimore, Pittsburgh and Chica-
go R. W. Co. v. Johnson....
Baltimore, Pittsburgh and Chica-
go R. W. Co. v. Johnson.........480
Baltimore, Pittsburgh and Chica-
go R. W. Co. v. McClellan........440
Baltimore, Pittsburgh and Chica-
go R. W. Co. v. Stoner............579
Barbee, Evansville and Crawfords-

ville R. R. Co. v......... Barber, Brown et al. v....... Beck et al. v. Venable......

Beeson et al. v. Beeson et al........
Behler et ux. v. Weyburn..
Billings, Clark et al. v......
Blair, Leonard et al. v..

Board of Comm'rs of Kosciusko
Co., Hayes v.

V........

Clapper, Clouser v........

..396

..548

..191

.508

.435 ...548

Clark, Ft. Wayne, Muncie and Cincinnati R. R. Co. v............. Clark et al. v. Billings. Clark et al. v. White et al. Clouser v. Clapper....... Coffelt, Melton et al. v........ ..310 Collins v. City of New Albany et al.396 Collins, Adm'x, v. Rose et al...... 33 ..592 Compton v. Ivey... ..352 .533 Corwin, Adm'r, Nelson, Adm'r, v.489 .408 Crane v. Indiana North and South

97 R. W. Co......... .143 Cupp, Rees v....

..165

..566

........552

Boyer, Hays et al. v.............

..516
..292 Dills v. The State............ ...........................
341 Dooley, Mays v.................... ..........
289 Dorrell, Ricketts v.......

..508 Cutler v. The State.
.510 Dale et al. v. Frisbie et al.
Davidson v. Nicholson....
Deutsch et ux. v. Korsmeier.
Dickerson, Ohio and Mississippi
R. W. Co. v.........

.300

...530

.411

.373

.317

Board of Comm'rs of Monroe Co.,
Moore et al. v........
Boyd, Bailey et al. v........

Boyer et al., Leeds v........

Bradford et al. v. Bradford et al..434 Drover v. Evans et al.

Brookville and Connersville Turn

pike Co. v. Pumphrey.
Brown et al. v. Barber.
Brown et al. v. Herron......
Bruner et al., Houston v...
Buchanan, Jackson v.....
Buchman v. The State.....
Bugle v. Myers.....

Buntin v. Hooper et al..........
Burroughs et al. v. Wilson.

Durflinger, Pontious v.

78 Durrah v. Stillwell....

..533 East, Adm'r, v. Ferguson et al.....169
61 Epperson, Evansville and Craw-
25 fordsville R. R. Co. v...

..390 Evans v. The State.........

.438

..563