The Fallacy of Campaign Finance ReformUniversity of Chicago Press, 2008 M09 15 - 328 páginas At first glance, campaign finance reform looks like a good idea. McCain-Feingold, for instance, regulates campaigns by prohibiting national political parties from accepting soft money contributions from corporations, labor unions, and wealthy individuals. But are such measures, or any of the numerous and similarly restrictive proposals that have circulated through Washington in recent years, really good for our democracy? |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 41
... definition, random. I have assumed that informed opinion concerning these matters should be guided by predictable rather than un- predictable considerations. I have also written little about presidential de- cisions to veto or to sign ...
... define those interests . One might infer that they are known by what they have done : giving money legally to the political parties that is not captured by the restrictions of federal election law . So defined , the special interests ...
... defined as “Big Money,” “the rich,” or “corporate America”—compose a particular interest that corrupts American government, thereby preventing a redistribution of wealth that would realize the Progressive dream of an egalitarian nation ...
Alcanzaste el límite de visualización de este libro.
Alcanzaste el límite de visualización de este libro.
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
Pasajes populares
Referencias a este libro
Compound Democracies: Why the United States and Europe Are Becoming Similar Sergio Fabbrini Sin vista previa disponible - 2007 |
Small Change: Money, Political Parties, and Campaign Finance Reform Raymond J. La Raja Vista previa limitada - 2008 |