Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB
[ocr errors]

"It has been generally thought, that the great attention. which has lately been paid to experimental philofophy in all its branches, and particularly to chemistry, muft enable us in time to account for many geological phenomena, which have hitherto been inexplicable; and that we are every day making advances towards a more correct knowledge of the ftructure of the globe, and the nature of the causes that have operated in the production of both the ftratified and unftratified parts of the earth. It is undeniable, that many very important difcoveries have already been made, and that many more may reafonably be expected to follow, from the peculiar attention paid to chemiftry; but what ever help we may receive from it, in judging of the present ope. ration of natural caufes, or in prognofticating future effects, I think it fcarcely allows us to be very confident, as to any fatis-, factory folution of paft operations. The very knowledge we have obtained of many fubftances hitherto entirely misunderstood, and whofe properties were formerly altogether mistaken, fhould certainly make us extremely cautious, not only of forming theo ries, but even of pronouncing any thing to be capable of being reduced to a certainty, concerning the action of any phyfical caufes in time past.

I have in the preceding note alluded to the opinion of many modern philofophers, that moft of our ftrata owe their origin to chemical precipitations: to mechanical precipitations from a liquid they must at least be referred; but this feems fcarcely fuf. ficient in any manner to account for the order and diftinétion of the feveral ftrata; they would furely in all instances be more mixed and confounded one with the other. And yet not only are they now found to be clearly feparable into ftrata of diftinét fubftances and materials; but often the animal and vegetable re liquia, imbedded in the feveral ftrata, are found to be of dif tinct fpecies, and to vary confiderably. This led M. de Lue to conceive, that whatever had been the determining caufe of fuch precipitations, it had not only affected the menftruum at the me ment, but fo changed its nature, and the nature also of the fuperincumbent atmosphere, as to have had an effect on animal life. And he thought he had difcovered fuch caufes, in the periodical developement and evolution of different elaftic fluids, from the bottom of the primitive ocean. It is not my business to verify this or any other hypothefis; but only to fuppofe it poffible, in order to fhew how little we must know of fuch operations, when every experiment in chemistry tends to prove, that the whole fyftem of chemical folutions and precipitations must depend on fuch curious affinities, and fuch an infinite variety of poffible combinations of fubftances, as to elude all our enquiries. And if chemical precipitations are rejected, and the aqueous origin of things fet afide, can we promife purfelves more, certainty from the adoption of the Vulcanic fyftem? Can we pretend to decide more clearly any thing concerning the paffible action and effects

of

of fire in time paft? I think not. I really apprehend, that to judge fairly of the matter, the determination of the specific caufess that may have operated in time paft in the body of the earth; may be faid to become every day more difficult, from the very difcovery of the many different ways, in which the action of all phyfical caufes whatfoever may be modified and affected. For to refer at once both to the Neptunian and Vulcanic theories, what can we be faid to know, or what are we ever likely to know, for certain, concerning the power of water to become an univerfal folvent, in particular circumstances, or of the action and effects of fre, under different circumftances of compreffion?" P. 321.

The notes to this difcourfe evince a very general and ac eurate knowledge of the modern theorics of the earth, and much of extremely curious information will be found in them, by those who are defirous of entering into fuch enquiries. The quantity of interefting matter, on thefe fub. jects, which is compreffed into thefe notes is really extraor dinary.

Thus far the lecturer may be confidered, as having no, ticed principally the attempts made by modern Reafon againft Revelation, in the three great branches of metaphyfics, liftery, and phyfics. It remains, in the feventh and eighth difcourfes, to treat of fuch attempts of the fame kind as may be referred to the heads of criticifm and ethics. Under thefe heads, therefore, we find introduced, the ftrange etymologi. cal fyftem of M. Volney; than which nothing more wildly abfurd and impudently prefumptuous was ever conceived; and the endeavours of the Socinians and others to explain away the fcriptural texts, on which the great and diftinctive doctrines of our holy Religion are founded,: namely, the doctrines of atonement, incarnation, and the Trinity. The fpeculations of thofe writers are alfo exainined, who contend, that Revelation was not neceffary for the enforcement of the laws of morality, which, according to them, Reafon was competent to difcover, and to recommend to practice,. The total want of all adequate fanction, to fyftems of morality merely human, is here very july infifted upon and alfo the inconfiftencies and contradictions of the most celebrated fpeculative moralifts.

Nor is it faying too much to affirm of modern theories, as : has been faid of the ancient ones, that there has been nothing adAnced by one modern philofopher that has not been contradicted and oppofed by another. Two of the moft popular writers of the continent, Rouffeau and Helvetius, differed totally and effenially in regard to the principles of their refpective fyftems.

Rouffeau

Rouffeau infifted continually on the original purity and goodness of man: Helvetius fpeaks of man as radically bad. According to the former, every virtue under heaven is to be found among the favage tribe; according to Helvetius, favages have no notion of justice or humanity, or even natural affection. According to Rouffeau, education and example are for ever the corruptors of primitive purity and native innocence; according to Helvetius, only education and example can render men feeling and humane +. According to Rouffeau, men are the best law to themselves: according to Helvetius, before the existence of fettled compacts and inftituted laws, there can be neither peace nor juftice among men. Helvetius differs as widely from our own countrymen, Shaftesbu. ry and Hutchefon; declaring, in terms of ridicule and contempt, that he could no more form an idea of a moral fenfe, than of a moral caftle, or a moral elephant !" P. 459

To the eight Bamptonian Lectures a ninth fermon is here fubjoined, having been preached before the University of Oxford immediately after them, and being upon a subject nearly connected. Its chief object is to prove the neceffity of public inftructors, under every fyftem of religion and morality, and thereby to explain, even to unbelievers, the importance of the Chriftian Priesthood.

In concluding our account of thefe Lectures, it is but juftice for us to fay, that we have never yet feen, within the fame compafs, fo much argument brought to bear against the various enemies of our Religion from without; or against the betrayers of it from within, who believe no more of Chriftianity than they can reconcile to their own fancies. Nor can we point out any other work in which fo much impor#ant information is brought together, on all the great fubjects in which modern wifdom has attempted to affail a Revelation, as will be found in the copious and very interefting notes, fubjoined to the eight first discourses.

"Helvetius pretends indeed to deny this; and afferts, that he differs from Rouffeau only in this; that as the latter pretends that man is born without vice, so he would maintain that he is equally born without virtue. But though Helvetius has admirably detected fome of Rouffeau's contradictions, he could not fee his own; for the following is his account of the state of nature. "Quel feroit dans toute fociété l'homme le plus déteftable? l'homme de la NATURE, qui n'ayant point fait de convention avec ses sembla, bles, n'obéiroit qu'à son caprice et au fentiment actuel qui l'in fpire."

† “La nature en avoit fait des fangliers."

BRITISH

BRITISH CATALOGUE.

POETRY..

ART. 11. Poems. By the Rev. Richard Mant, M.A. and late Fellow of Oriel College. 12mo. Longman and Rees. Price 3s. 6d. 1806.

These are compofitions of a higher order; and it is very confolatory to meet with fuch amidst a mixed multitude of dull effufions, called Poetry, with nothing to entitle them to the name but a given namber of fyllables in each line, with a certain jingle of words, called rhymes. This volume is the production of a fcholar and a man of tafte; of one who has read much, and not read in vain. Little more recommendation feems neceffary than to add the following fpecimen :

A WINTER SCENE.

Written on Christmas Day.

* "Tis fad to gaze when winter fhrouds

The fun's reluctant ray,

And veils in deep embitter'd clouds

The glories of the day.

When fighing to the gale the wood

His wither'd honour yields,

And dark is now the mountain flood,
With ftorms deform'd, and foul with mud,
And dimm'd the pleafant fields.

"For who that has an eye to view,
And who that has a breaft

To feel the charms that round him glow,
In fummer fplendour dreft,
O'er all the scene a glance can dart,
And fee without a figh;

Not all the fcene can now impart
A charm to glad his drooping heart,"
And fix his roving eye.

"O then 'tis fweet to think, the hour
Of gloom fhall pafs away,

And dark December's ftormy power
Soon yield to gentle May.
That foon the fun his laughing beam
From azure skies fhall fhed,
Soon on the torpid foreft gleam,
And tint with gold the lucid ftream,
And robe the verdant mead.

E'en

"E'en fo it is with them who trace
The monuments of death,
And mourn for man's devoted race;
Till to the eye of faith,
The winter of the grave to cheer,
Look forth the fmiling spring,
And leading Heav'n's eternal year,
The San of Righteoufness appear,
With healing on his wing."

Some of the poems in this collection have been published before, but we are well pleased to have the opportunity of feeing them again. The whole are characterized by much fimple ele gance, and by a fpirit of piety and patriotifm in the highest degree honourable to the author. The verfes addreffed to the poet's Father are exceedingly impreffive, nor are thofe lefs fo of which his wife is the fubject. We could fpecify many others which justify the warmeft praife.

ART. 12. Simonidea. 12mo. Price 2s. 6d. Robinfon. 1806.

The author in a quaint and fomewhat affected style tells us; in his preface, that he gave the name of Simonidea to his poems, because the first of them commemorate the dead. He proceeds to fay, that the Book of Ruth will convey to the English reader the best idea of the manner of Simonides; he adds that the Paradife Re. gained is the heaviest and dulleft poem that ever outlived its century, with other comical things. Nevertheless his poems, thofe in English we mean, are neither inelegant nor uninte. refting. The reader will probably not altogether difapprove of the following.

WRITTEN AT MALVERN.

"Come back ye fmiles that late forfook
Each breezy path and fenny nook ;

Come laughter, though the fage hath faid,
Thou favoureft moft the thoughtlefs head;
I blame thee not, howe'er inclin'd

To love the vacant cafy mind,
But now am ready, may it pleafe,
That mine be vacant and at ease.
Sweet children of celeftial breed,
Though much invoked, reprefs your fpeed ;
Laughter, though Momus gave thee birth,
And faid, my darling, ftay on earth;
Smiles, though from Venus you arise,
And live for ever in the skies;
I order that not one defcend,
But firft alights upon my friend;

« AnteriorContinuar »