 | Henry Roscoe - 1831 - 705 páginas
...cross-examination, whether he has made such declaration, or held such conversetion. liimit'scnun, 2 B. and B. 301. Before you can contradict a witness by 'showing he...general question, whether he has ever said so and so. Per Tindal, CJ Angus v. Smith, 1 M. and AT. 474. The witness may be reexamined as to these contradictory... | |
 | Richard Burn, Joseph Chitty, Montague B. Bere, Thomas Chitty - 1837
...showing he has *t some other time said something inconsistent with his present evidence, ;• • *u must ask him as to the time, place, and person involved...It is not enough to ask him the general question, wtether he has ever said so and so, because it may frequently happen that npon the general question... | |
 | Joseph Rockwell Swan - 1837 - 582 páginas
...asked upon cross-examination, whether he has made such declaration, and he should be asked ns ta^the time, place and person involved in the supposed contradiction. It is not enough io(d) ask him whether he has ever saidso, «nd so. A witness cannot be asked on crossexamination, a... | |
 | Samuel March Phillipps, Andrew Amos - 1838 - 1079 páginas
...subject, p. 467. gested to the witness, before any contradiction is attempted, (1) but he must be asked as to the time, place, and person involved in the supposed contradiction. (2) In a case, where (3) a witness was asked as to a statement, which he neither admitted, nor denied,... | |
 | Francis James Newman Rogers - 1840 - 1072 páginas
...can contradict a witness. " by shewing that he has at some other time said something in" consistent with his present evidence, you must ask him as to...the time, place, and person involved in the supposed contra" diction. It is not enough to ask him the general question, " whether he has ever said so and... | |
 | Henry Roscoe - 1844 - 832 páginas
...conversation. Qtteen't case, •J II. \ It. 301. Before j'ou can contradict a witness by showing that he has, at some other time, said something inconsistent...the time, place, and person involved in the supposed contradictions. It is not enough to ask him the general question, whether he has ever said so and so.... | |
 | Isaac Newton Blackford - 1844
...is not enough to ask the witness generally whether he has ever said 80 and so, but he must be asked as to the time, place, and person, involved in the supposed contradiction. Jlngut v. Smith, 1 Mood. & Malk. 473. If the witness deny the words, declaration, or act imputed to... | |
 | 1845
...inconsistent witfi his pre<r.: evidence, you must nsk him as to the time, place, and person mvolnd in the supposed contradiction. It is not enough to...whether he has ever said so and so, because it may fre(jm'n<lv happen that upon the general question he may not remember Ъ»тшг so said, whereas when... | |
 | John Pitt Taylor - 1848 - 1386 páginas
...before this can be done, it is generally held necessary, in the case of verbal statements, first to ask him as to the time, place, and person involved...him the general question, whether he has ever said so-andso, because it may frequently happen that, upon the general question, he may not remember having... | |
 | James Knox Polk - 1848 - 447 páginas
...other time said something inconsistent with his present evidence, you must ask him as to the time and place, and person involved in the supposed • contradiction....enough to ask him the general question, whether he has erer said so and 'so, because it may frequently happ,en that, upon the general question, he may not... | |
| |
... before this can be done, it is generally held necessary, in the case of verbal statements, first to ask him as to the time, place and person involved in the supposed contradiction. 
