The Devil then sent to Leipsic fair,

For Born's translation of Kant's book; A world of words, tail foremost, where Right-wrong-false-true-and foul—and fair, As in a lottery-wheel are shook.

Five thousand crammed octavo pages
Of German psychologics,―he
Who his furor verborum assuages

Thereon, deserves just seven months' wages
More than will e'er be due to me.

I looked on them nine several days,
And then I saw that they were bad;
A friend, too, spoke in their dispraise,—
He never read them;-with amaze

I found Sir William Drummond had.

When the book came, the Devil sent
It to P. Verbovale,* Esquire,
With a brief note of compliment,
By that night's Carlisle mail. It went,
And set his soul on fire.

Fire, which ex luce præbens fumum,
Made him beyond the bottom see
Of truth's clear well-when I and you Ma'am,
Go, as we shall do, subter humum,

We may know more than he.

Now Peter ran to seed in soul
Into a walking paradox;
For he was neither part nor whole,
Nor good, nor bad-nor knave nor fool,
-Among the woods and rocks.

*Quasi, Qui valet verba:-i. e. all the words which have been, Are, or may be expended by, for, against, with, or on him. A sufficient proof of the utility of this history. Peter's progenitor who selected this name seems to have possessed a pure anticipated rognition of the nature and modesty of this ornament of his pos terity.

Furious he rode, where late he ran,

Lashing and spurring his tame hobby;
Turned to a formal puritan,

A solemn and unsexual man,—
He half believed White Obi.

This steed in vision he would ride,
High trotting over nine-inch bridges,
With Flibbertigibbet, imp of pride,
Mocking and mowing by his side-
A mad-brained goblin for a guide-
Over corn-fields, gates, and hedges.

After these ghastly rides, he came

Home to his heart, and found from thence Much stolen of its accustomed flame; His thoughts grew weak, drowsy, and lame Of their intelligence.

To Peter's view, all seemed one hue;

He was no whig, he was no tory;

No Deist and no Christian he;

He got so subtle, that to be

Nothing, was all his glory.

One single point in his belief
From his organization sprung,
The heart-enrooted faith, the chief
Ear in his doctrines' blighted sheaf,
That “happiness is wrong;

So thought Calvin and Dominic;

So think their fierce successors, who
Even now would neither stint nor stick
Our flesh from off our bones to pick,
If they might "do their do.”

His morals thus were undermined :—

The old Peter-the hard, old Potter

Was born anew within his mind;
He grew dull, harsh, sly, unrefined,
As when he tramped beside the Otter.*

In the death hues of agony

Lambently flashing from a fish,
Now Peter felt amused to see
Shades like a rainbow's rise and flee,
Mixed with a certain hungry wish.†

So in his Country's dying face

He looked-and lovely as she lay,
Seeking in vain his last embrace,
Wailing her own abandoned case,
With hardened sneer he turned away:

And coolly to his own soul said

"Do you not think that we might make A poem on her when she's dead: Or, no—a thought is in my head

Her shroud for a new sheet I'll take.

"My wife wants one.-Let who will bury
This mangled corpse! And I and you,
My dearest Soul, will then make merry,
As the Prince Regent did with Sherry,-
Ay-and at last desert me too."

A famous river in the new Atlantis of the Dynastephyllo Pantisocratists.

† See the description of the beautiful colours produced during the agonizing death of a number of trout, in the fourth part of a long poem in blank verse, published within a few years. That poem contains curious evidence of the gradual hardening of a strong but circumscribed sensibility, of the perversion of a penetrating but panic-stricken understanding. The author might have derived a lesson which he had probably forgotten from these sweet and sublime verses.

This lesson, Shepherd, let us two divide,

Taught both by what she shows and what conceals,
Never to blend our pleasure or our pride

With sorrow of the meanest thing that feels.

* Nature.

And so his Soul would not be gay,

But moaned within him; like a fawn
Moaning within a cave, it lay
Wounded and wasting, day by day,
Till all its life of life was gone.

As troubled skies stain waters clear,

The storm in Peter's heart and mind Now made his verses dark and queer: They were the ghosts of what they were, Shaking dim grave-clothes in the wind.

For he now raved enormous folly,

Of Baptisms, Sunday-schools, and Graves, 'Twould make George Colman melancholy, To have heard him, like a male Molly, Chaunting those stupid staves.

Yet the Reviews, who heaped abuse
On Peter while he wrote for freedom,
So soon as in his song they spy
The folly which soothes tyranny,
Praise him, for those who feed 'em.

"He was a man, too great to scan;—

A planet lost in truth's keen rays :—
His virtue, awful and prodigious ;-
He was the most sublime, religious,
Pure-minded Poet of these days."

As soon as he read that, cried Peter,
"Eureka! I have found the way
To make a better thing of metre
Than e'er was made by living creature
Up to this blessed day.”

Then Peter wrote odes to the Devil;-
In one of which he meekly said:
"May Carnage and Slaughter,

Thy niece and thy daughter,
May Rapine and Famine,
Thy gorge ever cramming,

Glut thee with living and dead!

"May death and damnation,
And consternation,

Flit

up from hell with pure intent! Slash them at Manchester,

Glasgow, Leeds, and Chester;

Drench all with blood from Avon to Trent.

"Let thy body-guard yeomen

Hew down babes and women

And laugh with bold triumph till Heaven be rent, When Moloch in Jewry,

Munched children with fury,

It was thou, Devil, dining with pure intent."*

PART THE SEVENTH.

DOUBLE DAMNATION.

THE Devil now knew his proper cue.-
Soon as he read the ode, he drove
To his friend Lord Mac Murderchouse's,
A man of interest in both houses,

And said: "For money or for love,

*It is curious to observe how often extremes meet. Cobbett and Peter use the same language for a different purpose: Peter is indeed a sort of metrical Cobbett. Cobbett is, however, more mischievous than Peter, because he pollutes a holy and now unconquerable cause with the principles of legitimate murder; whilst the other only makes a bad one ridiculous and odious.

If either Peter or Cobbett should see this note, each will feel more indignation at being compared to the other than at any censure implied in the moral perversion laid to their charge.