The Marshall Decision and Native Rights
McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP, 2000 - 246 páginas
In The Marshall Decision and Native Rights Ken Coates explains the cross-cultural, legal, and political implications of the recent Supreme Court decision on the Donald Marshall case. He describes the events, personalities, and conflicts that brought the Maritimes to the brink of a major confrontation between Mi'kmaq and the non-Mi'kmaq fishers in the fall of 1999, detailing the bungling by federal departments and the lack of police preparedness. He shows how political, business, and Mi'kmaq leaders in the Maritimes handled the volatile situation, urging non-violence and speaking out against racism, in contrast to the way federal and regional leaders have responded in other parts of the country. Legal victories such as Marshall, argues Coates, are a double-edged sword that provide greater legal clarity but expand the gap between indigenous and non-indigenous peoples in Canada.
Coates recounts the history of Mi'kmaq-white contact in the region and considers the impact of native rights on natural resources, showing that the costs will be borne mainly by rural Canadians. By placing the local and regional reaction to the Marshall decision in the broader historical, national, and international context of indigenous political and legal rights The Marshall Decision and Native Rights shows how little Canada has learned from three decades of First Nations legal conflicts and how far the country is from meaningful reconciliation.
Ken Coates is a professor of history at the University of New Brunswick in Saint John and the author of many books on Canada's aboriginal peoples. He has advised governments in Canada and New Zealand on land claims and is a frequent commentator on aboriginal issues.
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
The Marshall Challenge and
Mikmaq Maliseet and Colonists
Aboriginal and Treaty Rights in Canada
Thomas Peter Paul and the Mikmaq Logging Dispute
The Marshall Crisis and East Coast Confrontations
Joshua Bernard Lobster Licences and
What Does It Mean? The Marshall Decision East Coast Fisheries
F Regina v Peter Paul New Brunswick Court of Appeal 22 April
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Aboriginal rights According action activities affairs agreed agreements anger Appeal argued assert attention authority band British Brunswick Burnt Church Canada Canadian challenge charged Chief claims clear coast communities companies continued Council Court decision critical Crown Crown land cultural deal debate demands Department determination early economic evidence face federal government fishery fishing forest French future going groups harvesting historical hunting Indian indigenous industry involved Island issues Judge judgment land leaders limited living lobster loggers logging major Maritimes Marshall decision meeting ment Mi'kmaq and Maliseet minister Nations native natural negotiations non-Aboriginal Nova Scotia observers Oceans October offered officials opportunity past political population potential problems protests provincial region regulations relations remain represent reserve response ruling season September settlements signed social society Supreme Court Thomas Peter Paul tion traditional traps treaty rights