aside;' and even Archbishop Sharp, although in many respects a High Churchman, told Thoresby that he did not much approve of singing the prayers,' but it having been the custom of all cathedrals since the Reformation, it is not to be altered without a law.'2 Exaggerated dread of Popery suspected latent evils, it scarcely knew what, lurking in this kind of worship. Perhaps, too, it was thought to border upon 'enthusiasm,' that other religious bugbear of the age. A paper in the 'Tatler' speaks of it not with disapproval, but with something of condescension to weaker minds, as 'the rapturous way of devotion.' 3 In fact, cathedrals in general were almost unintelligible to the prevalent sentiment of the eighteenth century. Towards the end of the period a spirit of appreciation grew up, which Malcolm speaks of as being in marked contrast with the contemptuous indifference of a former date." They were regarded, no doubt, with a certain pride as splendid national memorials of a kind of devotion that had long passed away. Some young friends of David Hume, who had been to service at St. Paul's and found scarcely anybody there, began to speak of the folly of lavishing money on such useless structures, The famous sceptic gently rebuked them for talking without judgment. St. Paul's,' he said, 'as a monument of the religious feeling and taste of the country, does it honour and will endure. We have wasted millions upon a single campaign in Flanders, and without any good resulting from it.' There was no fanatic dislike to cathedrals, as when Lord Brooke had hoped that he might see the day when not one stone of St. Paul's should be left upon another. They were simply neglected, as if both they and those who yet loved the mode of worship perpetuated in them belonged to a bygone generation. In the North this was not so much the case. Durham Cathedral especially seems to have retained, in a greater degree than any other, not only the grandeur and hospitality of an older period, but also the affections of the townsmen around it. Defoe, in 1728, found a congregation

5

Teale's Lives of Eminent E. Laymen, 260.

2 R. Thoresby's Diary, March 16, 1697.

3 Tatler, No. 198.

J. P. Malcolm, Manners, &c., of London, i. 230.

$ Caldwell Papers, quoted in Q. Rev. 97, 404.

Laud's Hist. of his Troubles, 201, quoted in Southey's Book of the Church, 472.

of 500 people at the six-o'clock morning service.' In most cases, even on Sundays, the attendance was miserably thin. Doubtless, many individual members of cathedral chapters loved the noble edifice and its solemn services with a very profound attachment; but as a general rule, they belonged to the past and to the future far more than to the present. The only mode of utilising cathedrals which seems to have been thoroughly to the taste of the last century was the converting them into music-halls for oratorios. Early in the century we find Dean Swift at Dublin consenting, not, however, without much demur, to 'lend his cathedral to players and scrapers,' to act what he called their opera. Next, in St. Paul's, at the annual anniversary of the Sons of the Clergy, sober Churchmen saw with disgust a careless, pleasure-loving audience listening to singers promiscuously gathered from the theatres, and laughing, and eating, and drinking their wine in the intervals of the performance. Then came the festivals of the Three Choirs at Worcester, Gloucester, and Hereford, always open to objection, still more so at a time when the managers thought of little but how to achieve for their undertaking popularity and pecuniary success. Sublime as is the music of The Messiah,' it was not often performed in the last century without circumstances which jarred strongly against the devotional feeling of a deeply religious man like John Newton, and led him to what might otherwise seem a most unreasonable hatred of oratorios.4

In Queen Anne's time, there was often no part of the Church service in which the High or Low Church tone of the congregation was more closely betokened than when the preacher had just entered the pulpit. In the one case, the Bidding Prayer was said; in the other, there was an extempore prayer, often of considerable length, commonly called the pulpit prayer. The Bidding Prayer had its origin in preReformation times. The way was first for the preacher to name and open his text, and then to call on the people to go to their prayers, and to tell them what they were to pray for ; after which all the people said their beads in a general silence, Walcot's Cathedrals, 101.

2 Dr. Swift, To Himself on St. Cecilia's Day. Anderson's B. Poets, ix. 107. Malcolm's London, i. 267.

3

and the preacher also kneeled down and said his.'1 It was thus not a prayer, but an exhortation to prayer, an instruction in the points commended to private but united worship. In Henry VIII.'s time the Pope's name was omitted, and prayer for the King under his proper titles strictly enjoined. In Elizabeth's reign, praise for all who had departed in God's faith was substituted for prayer in their behalf. By the existing Canons, as agreed upon in 1603, preachers were instructed to move the people to join with them in prayer before the sermon either in the Bidding form, or to that effect as briefly as conveniently they may.' It was, however, no longer clear whether it were itself a prayer, or, as in former time, an admonition to pray. On the one hand, it was called 'a form of prayer,' and was followed without a pause by the Lord's Prayer, and then by the sermon. On the other hand, it was prefaced not by the familiar 'Let us pray,' but by the old bidding, 'Ye shall pray,' or Pray ye,' and the congregation stood as listeners until the Lord's Prayer began. Hence a difference in practice arose, curiously characteristic of the controversies, ecclesiastical and political, which were being agitated at the end of the seventeenth and the beginning of the eighteenth century. In Charles I.'s reign, many of the clergy had chosen to consider it a prayer, and taking advantage of the permission to vary it, had converted it into one of those extempore effusions which Puritan feeling considered so peculiarly edifying. It need hardly be added, that the Anglican party were more than ever careful to adhere to the older usage. After the Restoration, the Bidding Prayer was for a time not very much used, and the pulpit prayer, as adopted by Low Churchmen from Puritans and Presbyterians, began in many places to assume a most prominent position. 'Some men,' Sherlock said, in 1681, 'think they worship God sufficiently if they come time enough to Church to join in the pulpit prayer.' High Churchmen could not endure it. It is

5

1 Burnet's Hist. of the Ref., quoted in S. Hilliard's Obligation of the Clergy to keep strictly to the Bidding form, 1715, 8.

2 Wheatley's B. of Common Prayer, 1860, 171.

$ Canon 55.

5 Hilliard's Obligations, &c., 19.

4 Bisse's Beauty of Holiness, 1721, 154.

Sherlock On Public Worship, 1681, 188.

24

a long, crude, extemporary prayer,' said South, 'in reproach of all the prayers which the Church, with such an admirable prudence and devotion, has been making before.'1 The use, however, of extempore prayer in this part of the service was defended by some of the clergy and bishops, as agreeable to the people, as conformable to the custom of the Reformed Churches abroad,2 and attractive to those among the Presbyterians and other denominations who only needed encouragement and a few slight concessions to exchange occasional for constant conformity. Meanwhile, at the end of the preceding century, 'the Bidding' had been more generally revived. Archbishop Tenison, in a circular to the clergy of 1695, had called attention to the neglect of it, and the Bishop of London revived its general use in his own diocese, to the astonishment, says Fleetwood, of many congregations who stared and stood amazed at 'Ye shall pray. In Queen Anne's time it became very general," being quite in accord with the High Church sentiment which had then strongly set in. A political bias also was suspected. Not, perhaps, without reason; for it was a time when political prepossessions which could not openly be declared, found vent in all kinds of byways. After the Revolution, while the title of the new sovereign was not yet secure, the Clergy were specially enjoined, that however else they might vary their prayer or exhortation to prayer before the sermon, they were in any case to mention the King by name. It was saidwhether in sarcasm or as a grave reality-that the semi-Jacobite parsons, of whom there were many, found satisfaction in discovering a mode by which they could show at once their duty and their disgust' in a manner unexceptionably accordant with the law and with the Canon. 'Ye are bidden to pray,' or, as a certain Dr. Malways worded it, 'Ye must pray,'' did not necessarily imply much heart in fulfilling the

'South's Works, iv. 180. He elsewhere calls it 'a long, crude, impertinent, upstart harangue.' So also Complaint of the Ch. of E., 1709, 19, and Thoresby's Diary, June 14, 1714. The Royal Guard, &c., 1684, 49.

2 J. Bingham's French Church's Apology for the Ch. of E.-Works, ix. 106. Stoughton's Church of the Revolution, 205.

Fleetwood's Defence of Praying before Sermon, 1720-Works, 738.

5 G. G. Perry's Hist of the Ch., 3, 228.

6 The Justice and Necessity of restraining the Clergy, &c., 1715, 64. 7 Id.

injunction by which the people were called upon to pray for their new lords. But, curiously enough, when George I. came to the throne, the political gloss attached to the Bidding' became reversed. In the royal directions to the archbishops, the canonical form, with the royal titles included, was strictly enjoined; and consequently not those who used, but those who neglected it, ran a risk of being set down as having Jacobite proclivities. It had, however, never been really popular, and few objected to its gradual disuse. Ever since the Revolution, it had introduced into a portion of the public worship far too decided an element of political feeling. The objection was the greater, because the liberty of variation had given it a certain personal character. If the preacher did not keep strictly to the words of the Canon, he could scarcely avoid making it appear, by the names omitted or inserted, what might be his political, his ecclesiastical, or his academical opinions. Those, again, whose respect for dignities was in excess,- a foible to which the age was prone-would go through a list of titles, illustrious, right reverend, and right honourable, which ill accorded with a time of prayer. Before the middle of the century, except in university churches or on formal occasions, the Canon became generally obsolete, and the sermon was prefaced, as often in our own day, by a Collect and the Lord's Prayer.

At the opening of the eighteenth century the pulpit was no longer the power it had been in past days. It had been the strongest support of the Reformation; and monarchs and statesmen had known well how immense was its influence in informing and guiding the popular mind on all questions which bore upon religion or Church politics. In proportion, however, as the agency of the press had been developed, the preachers had lost more and more of their old monopoly. Numberless essays and pamphlets appeared, reflecting all shades of educated opinion, with much to say on questions of social morality and the duties of Churchmen and citizens. They did not by any means interfere with the primary office of the sermon. They were calculated rather to do preaching a good service. When other means of instruction are wanting, Direction to our Archbishops, &c., Dec. 11, 1714, § vi.

2 Spectator, No. 312.