Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Appellate Court of the State of Indiana, Volumen4Bowen-Merrill Company, 1893 "With tables of the cases reported and cases cited and an index." (varies) |
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
affidavit agent agreement alleged amount answer appellant's appellee appellee's assessment assignment of error attorney averments Board of Commissioners bridge cause of action choses in action Circuit Court City claim complaint conductor contract Corydon court erred Crawfordsville CRUMPACKER damages Davis defendant demurrer denial dollars duty Evansville evidence ex rel execution facts favor fence Filed March held horse husband Indiana Indianapolis injury instructions J.-This Jeffersonville judg judgment is affirmed jury Lake County Lake Erie lant's liability Louisville ment motion Mount Summit negligence notice overruled owner paid parties payment pellant pellee Pennsylvania Co Pennsylvania Company person plaintiff plead possession purchased question R. W. Co railroad company real estate reason record recover refused replevin reversed rule statute sufficient supra sustained Terre Haute thereof ticket tion Tipton County township track train trial trustee witness
Pasajes populares
Página 53 - When the death of one is caused by the wrongful act or omission of another, the personal representatives of the former may maintain an action therefor against the latter, if the former might have maintained an action, had he lived, against the latter for an injury for the same act or omission.
Página 548 - Salk. 282, as a general position," that no master is chargeable with the acts of his servant but when he acts in the execution of the authority given him." Now when a servant quits sight of the object for which he is employed, and without having in view his master's orders pursues that which his own malice suggests, he no longer acts in pursuance of the authority given him, and according to the doctrine of Lord Holt his master will not be answerable for such act.
Página 53 - A cause of action arising out of an injury to the person dies with the person of either party, except in cases in which an action is given for an injury causing the death of any person, and actions for seduction, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution.
Página 200 - All conveyances and devises of lands, or of any interest therein, made to two or more persons, except as provided in the next following section, shall be construed to create estates in common, and not in joint tenancy, unless it...
Página 336 - Where the property has been delivered to the plaintiff, and the defendant claims a return thereof, judgment for the defendant may be for the return of the property, or its value in case a return cannot be had, and the damages for the taking and withholding of the property.
Página 53 - A father, or, in case of his death or desertion of his family, the mother, may maintain an action for the injury or death of a minor child, and a guardian for the injury or death of his ward, when such injury or death is caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another.
Página 201 - no lands of any married woman shall be liable for the debts of her husband ; but such lands, and the profits therefrom, shall be her separate property, as fully as if she were unmarried: Provided, that such wife shall have no power to encumber or convey such lands, except by deed in which her husband shall join.
Página 205 - And She may, in her own name, as if she were unmarried, at any time during coverture, sell, barter, exchange, and convey her personal property; and she may also, in like manner, make any contracts with reference to the same...
Página 135 - ... respondeat superior applies. But if, on the other hand, they are elected or appointed by the corporation, in obedience to the statute, to perform a public service, not peculiarly local or corporate, but because this mode of selection has been deemed expedient by the legislature in the distribution of the powers of...
Página 524 - It was the bridge that appellant was attempting to cross, and if the bridge itself was obscured in darkness, and not protected by railing, it is easy to see how the injury may have happened to the appellant when it would not have happened had it been protected by railing. When the rule that all reasonable presumptions will be indulged in favor of the general verdict, and nothing will be presumed in support of the special finding of fact is applied to the answers of the jury to the interrogatories...