Opiniones

Comentarios de usuarios

Crítica de los usuarios - Marcar como inadecuado

I'm currently reading this withkeen interest since my grandfather C.A. Larson, a pacificst Lutheran preacher, shared the poduium with Lindbergh, Sr., at a July 4 peace rally in Triumph, Minnesota. Subsequently, he was imprisoned (primarily or his own safety. When he was released, he and the family (incl. my mother, Signe Larson) "escaped" to Canada for the duration of the war. I see that Lindbergh (and apparently his son) were convinced that sinister manipulative forces were controlling the supply of money, from big business to the distributive channels of the banking system. So, besides the peace initiative, Lindbergh may have had an economic argument to support it.
The problem with all of the arguments against a coorupt money system and the unequal distribution of wealth is that they inevitably provoke charges of anti-Semitism. (Lindbergh's son had to deal with the same accusations of bias.) If there is any basis to the charges against a long-suffering people, I hope to discern them as well as to understand more completely arguably the greatest poet, critic, and man of letters of the 20th century--responsible for changing the work of T.S.Eliot, W.B. Yeats, Joyce, Hemingway and so many others besides his own formidable creations ("The Cantos"--the most notoriously difficult poem in the language). During the 2nd World War Pound began ranting against the West's system of "usury" (the userers, while receiving little attention by Dante, are placed in one of the circles in lower hell in the cantos of "The Inferno"). Because of his "apparent" lunacy together with his perceived racism, Pound was incarcerated in the U.S. after the War and relegated to a footnote, a silent one. (Poets are, to my mind, musicial artists. The meanings of poets and composers are both dependent upon the "temporal" whereas the visual artists use the language of "space.")
Geniuses have their demons, warts, compulsions--without which their works of art would not be what they are If there is beauty in Pound' poetry,, II would hate to see it suppressed by the "oppressive" orces against which he was rightly or wrongly railing. That would be like the contingency that suddently decided they wanted no further engagement (of themselves or their families) with "the Nutcracker" because Tchaikowsky was gay.
 

Crítica de los usuarios - Marcar como inadecuado

Where are pages 158-174, and 175-190?? They are not present in the scan. The discourse on political parties on pages 155+ is excellent and unfortunately the tail end of it (158+) is not there...

Todos los comentarios - 2
3 estrellas - 0
2 estrellas - 0
1 estrella - 0
Sin calificación - 0

Todos los comentarios - 2
Comentarios editoriales - 0

Todos los comentarios - 2