Political declamation or difcuffion unfit for the pulpit, iii. 298,
Polyander, his remark on the fynod of Dort, on the fupercilious demeanor of the Arminians, ii. 254.
Polycarp, i. 134. Extracts from his Epiftles to the Philippians, ibid. 135.
Ponet, Dr. John, Bishop of Winchester, fome account of him, i. 249, 250. note. See Catechifm.
Poole, Mr. Edmund, the martyr, ii. 50.
Pontius Pilate, an afferter of free-will, vi. 72. For which Chrift reprimanded him, 73.
Pope, Mr. quoted, iii. 281. note, 292. vi. 34. 52.92. 134. 67. 76. note.
Popery, grofs advances toward it in the reign of Charles the First, i. xxxv. Arminianifm the turnpike-road to it, xxxiii. 94. ii. 270. (See Arminianifm.) Mr. Welley's lax idea of Popery, i. 97. note. Loft much ground during the Marian perfecution of Proteftants, ii. 148.
Poplinerius, Launcelot, his teftimony concerning the Waldenfes, ii. 140.
Potter, Chriftopher, two letters of his to Laud, i. 66. 68. note. His pains to ingratiate himfelf with that prelate, 67. Halts between Calvinifm and Arminianifm, 69-71. note. A dex- terous trimmer, ibid. note. A remarkable circumftance of him, iv. 144.
Prayer, irreconcilable with the Arminian doctrine of free-will, i. 209. Warranted by predeftination, ii. 126. An appointed mean to appointed ends, vi. 84. By no means incompatible with predestination, 98, 99.
Prayers for private ufe, bound up with the Liturgy, ii. 128, 129. A courfe of, for a family, v. 482, &c.
Preaching to finners perfectly compatible with the doctrine of predestination, exemplified, v. 278.
Predeftination, a doctrine peculiarly offenfive to the church of Rome, i. 74. 82. 93. ii. 186. The Pelagian idea of it, i. xxxii. 50. 171. ii. 53. The denial of predeftination fe verely punished by our English reformers, i. xxv. note. 49, 50. ii. 146. 210. Apoftatized from, at modern Geneva, 64. St. Auftin's doctrine of, i. 101, IC2. Judiciously ftated by Re- migius of Lyons, 153, 154. Held by the church of England, i. 110. ii. 258. 210. 291. 293. and by the primitive church, i. 110-114. Definitions of it, 206. 316. 332, 333. ii. 192. 205. Extends to all things, i. 316. 332. ii. 204. Has no foundation but the fovereign will of God, i. 235. ii. 205, 206. 238. Is infallibly effectual, i. 228. Archbishop Bancroft's method of reafoning upon it, 273, 274. and Mr. Bradford's, ii. 74. How it differs from election, 205. Nothing unjust or arbitrary in the belief of it, iii. 290. Ufes and abufes of, vi. 111, 112. The doctrine of, ftated and afferted, 195, 312. Does not fet afide the means, v. 214. Explained as it relates
to all men, 238. Ought to be openly preached and infifted. upon, 280. Exemplified, 278. A clear mirror to see the attributes of God in, 294. Does not annihilate fin, 419. 426. Nor reduce men to machines, 378. 411. Nor clash with the future judgment, 431. Harmonifes with neceffity, vi. 46. note.
Prefervation, divine, the cause of perfeverance, i. 302. 306. 311, 312. 321. ii. 25. 58, 59. 100.
Prevaricating from the grammatical fenfe of the articles, the tendency thereof, v. 28, 29.
Pride, the parent of discontent, iii. 280.
Prideaux, Dr. John, Bishop of Worcester, his memorable speech to James the First, ii. 280. Profecutes Mr. Brydges for Arminianifm, 317.
Prieft, a fat-headed one, ii. 92. Very ftrenuous against pre- deftination, and in behalf of free-will, 93.
Priestley, Dr. quoted, vi. 37. note. 133. His complete victory over the Doctors Reid, Beattie, and Ofwald, 44. note. An un- guarded expreffion of his, 249. His philofophic writings regarded by many Calvinifts, 250. Though heteredox, yet a man of probity, 299. i. 86. (Memoirs.)
Prior, Matthew, a reply of his, iv. 155.
Prophecy, affords an irrefragable argument and proof of pre- deftination or neceffity, i. 177-179. iii. 571. vi. 59-62. Summary of fcripture prophecies, iii. 571.
Providence of God, i. 198. 202, 203. 205. 266. 275. 277. 278. 311. 334, 335. ii. 75. 84. 131. Particular and unlimited, an eminent branch in the Chriftian fyftem, iii. 155. Its uni- verfal agency fo as to extend to every thing, v. 395. 420. vi. 35. 51. 54, 55. 76, 77. note. 87. 91, 110. Its myfteriousness, no juft reafon for either denying or blafpheming it, v. 392. 426. 447. Neceffity another name for it, vi. 46. note. ticularly concerned in the birth and death of men, 80-87. And of inferior animals, ibid.
Providential deliverances, iii. 117. Difpenfations, 119. Prynne, William, excluded the Houfe of Commons for his loyalty to Charles I. ii. 300, 301. His zeal for the restoration of monarchy, ibid. Accepted of a place under Charles II. ibid. Other particulars of him, 300, 301.
Pulpits, at variance with the desk, i. viii. ii. 355.
Puritanism falfely charged on the Calvinistic doctrine, ii. 323. 345-849. Judgment of Archbishop Ufher and Bishop Saunderfon on this matter, 347. 350.
Puritans, ancient, fome of them actuated by a very perverse fpirit, ii. 167. 361. note. Did not diffent from the doctrines, but from the ceremonies, of the church, 349, 350. v. 85.
QUALITIES, fenfible, of matter, what they are, vi. 116.
From whence they refult, ibid. 122, 123. 132. 139. Would be totally reverfed, if our organs of perception were oppofitely conftituted to what they are, 124, 125. 134, 135. 142. Quarto Bible, published in the reign of Edward the Sixth, ii. Other editions during the reign of Elizabeth, ii. 115-
113. 123. Query, concerning a paffage in the marriage ceremony, iii. 445. Quefnel Pafquier, fample of the, 101. Propofition for which he was anathematifed by the Pope, i. 92. His exile, impri- fonment and death, 94.
Queftions and anfwers, concerning predeftination, formerly bound up with our English Bibles, ii. 123-127. Their authority vindicated, 124.
RAMSAY, Chevalier, collects the conjectures of the ancients concerning the rife of moral evil, vi. 102. note.
Randal Anthony, deprived for Ranterism, i. 106. A view of his tenets, ibid.
Ranters, a continuatiou of the Familifts, i. 104.
predestination was not abfolute, but conditional, 105. Vio- lent advocates for free will and perfection, ibid. note. Bore a vehement enmity to the Puritans, 108. Their fhameless pre- tences to veneration for the church of England, ibid. Main- tained univerfal grace and redemption, ibid. 109. Dr. Fuller's character of them, ibid. (See more, under the article of Fifth- monarchy-men.)
Redemption, not unlimited, i. 120. 123. 129. 141. 143. 144. 148. 266. 295-299. 322. ii. 72. 193. What redemption really is, i. 295. Limited, not difcouraging, ii. 72. Conditional, a modith tenet, iii 29. The confequence of fuch a fyftem, 30. Not left at uncertainty, 399. A finished work, vi. 104. The extent of, 128. Some very pertinent reflections thereon, 129, &c.
Refinement, focial, not natural to man, vi. 49, 50. note.
Reflection on the beginning of the year, iii. 454. Not a fource of any new ideas, vi. 24.
Reformation, at what time it took its rife, v. 19. At prefent a fad awful departure from the principles, vi. 150. The fruit fuch declension produces, ibid. 151.
Reformers, English, were profeffed Calvinifts in coctrine, i.24. Large proof of this, i. 243-348.
Regeneration, the work of efficacious grace, i. 119. 284. 285. 310.
An evidence of election, 273, 274. Man unable to contribute any thing towards it, ii. 98, 99. Its priority, v. 94. Not the effect of human power, vi. 69. 108. See Grace.
Reinerius, a Popish inquifitor in the twelfth century, his account of the Waldenfes, i. 140.
Religion of Chrift, peculiarly diftinguished from every other in one particular, iii. 241. 203
Religious ignorance in a perfon of quality, iv. 162. 175. 190. Remarks on peculiar paffages of fcripture, Eccles. vii. 16. iii. 425. i. Cor. xv. 28-428. Rom. viii. 4-430. Rom. ix. 3- 432. i. Cor. xv. 29-434. i. Cor. xv. 5-435. Cant. viii.
Remigius, Archbishop of Lyons, i. 152-154.
Repentance, the gift of God, i. 130. A mafterly confideration thereof, iii. 249, &c.
Reprobate, their number fixed and determined, v. 246. Reprobation, denied by the Pelagians, i. 50. ii. 259. note. Cal- vin falfely charged with terming it a horrible decree, 352. Peter Martyr's definition of it, i. 336. Does not make God the author of fin, ibid. ii. 132. A doctrine we are not obliged to wade in, 101. Exprefsly revealed in fcripture, i. 320. ii. 116. 118. 120, 121. vi. 109. Plainly deducible and implied in the 39 Articles, ii. 108. note. 200. 210. 322. vi. 109, 110. and in the homilies, 127, 128. The Arminians at the fynod of Dort would fain have put reprobation before election, ii. 257, 258. A doctrine extremely offenfive to Pelagians, 259. note. Bishop Saunderfon's view of it, 308, 309. As it refpects angels, v. 393. And the ungodly, 258. &c. Reprobation of fome men moft expressly affirmed in fcripture, 402, 403. 407. No ways cruel on the part of God, and why, 273. Not inconfiftent with divine juftice, 388. Nor with mercy, 397. Nor with the nature of fin, 419. Nor with future judgment, 276. Its equity, proved from the inequality of God's providential difpenfations, 392. 394. Is rather a negative thing, than pofitive, 399. Irreversible, 405. See also, vi. 56. 89. note. Reproof to a minifter on his remiffness, vi. 147, 148.
Retraction, a model recommended to an Arminian, i. xxiii—
Rheims, English Papifts at, publish a falfe tranflation of the New Teftament, with fophiftical notes, ii. 196. Confuted by Dr. Fulke, 197
Richard 1. his reign and crufade to the holy land, ii. 398. His death and interment, 400. His defpicable character,
Anecdote of him, iv. 150.
II. his reign, fome traits in his character, ii. 411. His confinement, death, indecent burial, and re-interment, 413.
III. his reign, ii. 424. Slain in battle, 426. And interment, ibid. Ridicule, no teft of truth, vi. 27, 28. note. Hh z
Ridley, Bishop, confeffed before his Popish judges, that he aflifted in drawing up Ponet's catechifm, i. 250. And that he fubfcribed it when finished, ibid. Some account of him and his manner of living, 159, 266-268. His intense study of the Scriptures, ibid. His atteftation to the Calvinistic doctrine, 262-266. His profound veneration for Ponet's catechifm, and for the articles and homilies, 260, 261. His remarkable kindness to Bonner's mother, 267. The most learned of all our (native) English reformers, 268. Writes a defence of predeftination, in oppofition to the Free-will men, ii. 78. Righteous, over much, in what respect, iii. 424.
Righteoufnefs of Chrift, the only obedience by which we can be juftified before God, i. 141. 290-292. Must be carefully diftinguished from inherent righteousness, ii. 22.
Rogers, Mr. John, the first martyr who fuffered in the reign of Mary the Bloody, ii. 23, 24. His tranquillity just before his execution, iv. 158.
Rogers, Mr. Thomas, publishes an expofition of the 39 Articles,
Rollin, Monfieur, a fine observation from, v. 169.
Romaine, Mr. a reply of his, to one under spiritual trouble, iv. 174. Mrs. an appofite answer of her's to a clergymen, iv. 172.
Rome, church of, favoured by Archbishop Laud, i. 68. note.
72. Exults at the deluge of Arminianifm which overflows the church of England, ibid. Thunders against Calvinism, 74-78.80-83.87-90. 93. Struck with alarm at Calvin's defign of uniting the Proteftants into one body, ii. 151. note. Very angry with the doctrine of abfolute predeftination, 186. 198. Afferts two juftifications, 194. 200. Teaches election upon works forefeen, 195. 199. 207. Peculiarly enraged against the fynod of Dort, 253. 271. Roth, Mr. Richard, the martyr, ii. 62.
Rough, Mr. John, the martyr, ii. 62.
Rowe, Mr. Thomas, fome account of, iii. 121. 123.
Rowe, Mrs. Elizabeth, her life and death, iv. 118.
Rule of human actions, what, v. 47.
SAINTS, in glory, know each other, reafons affigned for the affertion, vi. 287, 286.
Salvation, our own perfonal knowledge of, by no means pre- fumptuous, iii. 209.
Samuel, Mr. Robert, the martyr, ii. 44-46.
Sapma, the Arminian, his outrageous infolence to the fynod of Dort, ii. 260. note.
Saunders, Mr. Laurence, the martyr, ii. 24—26.
Saunderson, Dr. Robert, Bishop of Lincoln, his opinion of Cal-
« AnteriorContinuar » |