The Language WarUniversity of California Press, 2000 M05 22 - 332 páginas Robin Lakoff gets to the heart of one of the most fascinating and pressing issues in American society today: who holds power and how they use it, keep it, or lose it. In a brilliant and vastly entertaining discussion of news events that have occupied an enormous amount of media space--political correctness, the Anita Hill/Clarence Thomas hearings, Hillary Rodham Clinton as First Lady, O. J. Simpson's murder trial, the Ebonics controversy, and the Clinton sex scandal--Lakoff shows that the struggle for power and status at the end of the century is being played out as a war over language. Controlling language is a basis for all power, she says, and therefore it is worth fighting for. As a result, newly emergent groups, especially blacks and women, are contending with middle- to upper-class white men for a share in "language rights." Lakoff's introduction to linguistic theories and the philosophy of language lays the groundwork for an exploration of news stories that meet what she calls the UAT (Undue Attention Test). As the stories became the subject of talk-show debates, late-night comedy routines, Web sites, and magazine articles, they were embroidered with additional meanings, depending on who was telling the story. Race, gender, or both are at the heart of these stories, and each one is about the right to construct meanings from languagein short, to possess power. Because language tells us how we are connected to one another, who has power and who does not, the stories reflect the language war. We use language to analyze what we call "reality," the author argues, but we mistrust how language is used today--witness the "politics of personal destruction" following the Clinton impeachment. Yet Lakoff sees in the struggle over language a positive goal: equality in the creation of our national discourse. Her writing is accessible and witty, and her excerpts from the media are used to great effect. |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 42
Página 8
... statements can be just as incoherent as informal ones ) . But in simplifying your life this way , you make linguistics an artificial field , condemned to turn away just as things get interesting , unable to make a true rapprochement ...
... statements can be just as incoherent as informal ones ) . But in simplifying your life this way , you make linguistics an artificial field , condemned to turn away just as things get interesting , unable to make a true rapprochement ...
Página 24
... statement of a simple factual observation to an accusation blaming some- one else the cat , or the addressee . These choices are language politics in action : the way we determine who bears the responsibility for a mishap , who owes ...
... statement of a simple factual observation to an accusation blaming some- one else the cat , or the addressee . These choices are language politics in action : the way we determine who bears the responsibility for a mishap , who owes ...
Página 25
... statement of unilateral power . Through most of this , Saddam maintained remarkable tolerance , but finally he snapped and hostilities began . The president could have apologized at any point . Instead , he esca- lated his insults . The ...
... statement of unilateral power . Through most of this , Saddam maintained remarkable tolerance , but finally he snapped and hostilities began . The president could have apologized at any point . Instead , he esca- lated his insults . The ...
Página 26
Alcanzaste el límite de visualización de este libro.
Alcanzaste el límite de visualización de este libro.
Página 29
Alcanzaste el límite de visualización de este libro.
Alcanzaste el límite de visualización de este libro.
Contenido
1 | |
17 | |
THE NEUTRALITY OF THE STATUS QUO | 42 |
POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AND HATE SPEECH The Word as Sword | 86 |
MAD BAD AND HAD The Anita Hill Clarence Thomas Narratives | 118 |
HILLARY ROOHAM CLINTON What the Sphinx Thinks | 158 |
WHO FRAMED OJ? | 194 |
EBONICS ITS CHRONIC | 227 |
THE STORY OF UGH | 252 |
Notes | 283 |
References | 303 |
Index | 313 |
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
AAVE African American ambiguity Amendment Anita Anita Hill apology argue argument behavior Bill Clinton Chaplinsky Chapter claim Clarence Thomas conservative created critics culture defense Democrats dialects discourse discussion Ebonics English exnominated expression fact feel feminists frame Gategate gender hate speech hearing Hill Hill's Hill/Thomas Hillary Rodham Clinton human interpretation jurors jury Kathleen Willey kind lady language linguistic male markedness meaning ment narrative never Niger-Congo language nonstandard normal O. J. Simpson October Oleanna OSB's Paula Jones percent person play politically correct position president problem question racist reality reason Republicans response rhetoric role seems Senate sense sexual harassment side social society someone speak speakers Starr statement story suggests talk television tell term things Thomas tion trial true understand utterance verdict victim woman women words
Pasajes populares
Página 227 - When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean— neither more nor less." "The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things." "The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master— that's all.
Página 87 - As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he was valiant, I honour him; but, as he was ambitious, I slew him.
Página 38 - Dear, dear! How queer everything is to-day! And yesterday things went on just as usual. I wonder if I've been changed in the night ? Let me think: was I the same when I got up this morning? I almost think I can remember feeling a little different. But if I'm not the same, the next question is, Who in the world am I ? Ah, that's the great puzzle!
Página 106 - There are certain well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise any Constitutional problem. These include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous, and the insulting or 'fighting' words—- those which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace.
Página 106 - It has been well observed that such utterances are no essential part of any exposition of ideas, and are of such slight social value as a step to truth that any benefit that may be derived from them is clearly outweighed by the social interest in order and morality.
Página 139 - I will not provide the rope for my own lynching or for further humiliation. I am not going to engage in discussions, nor will I submit to roving questions of what goes on in the most intimate parts of my private life or the sanctity of my bedroom. These are the most intimate parts of my privacy, and they will remain just that, private.
Página 61 - JUST the place for a Snark!' the Bellman cried, As he landed his crew with care; Supporting each man on the top of the tide By a finger entwined in his hair. 'Just the place for a Snark! I have said it twice: That alone should encourage the crew. Just the place for a Snark! I have said it thrice: What I tell you three times is true.
Página 54 - ... and requires proof before he can accept the truth of any proposition ; his trained intelligence works like a piece of mechanism. The mind of the Oriental, on the other hand, like his picturesque streets, is eminently wanting in symmetry. His...