...through or under the grantor by whom such deed was executed. .26. 583. 6. Where a purchaser can not make out a title but by a deed which leads him to another fact, he shall be presumed to have notice of such fact. Ib. 583, 584. 7. A purchaser of the...

...So, in like manner, it has been decided, in [fltiU cases almost innumerable, that " where a purchaser cannot make out a title, but by a deed which leads him to another fact, whether by description of the parties, recital or otherwise, he will be deemed conusant...

...its existence. Le Neve v. Le Neve, 2 Lead. Cases in Equity (Har. & Wai.), tp 152. " Where a purchaser cannot make out a title but by a deed which leads him to another fact, the purchaser shall not be a purchaser without notice of that fact, but shall be presumed...

...sufficient to put a party upon inquiry, is in equity held to be good notice to bind him. Where a purchaser cannot make out a title but by a deed which leads him to another fact, he shall be presumed to have knowledge of that fact : 2 Fonbl. Eq. 63, ch. 3, § 1, note...

...upon inquiry, and had full notice. It is said in Garrard v. RR Co., 29 Pa. 158, " Where a purchaser cannot make out a title but by a deed which leads him to another fact, he shall be presumed to have knowledge of that fact. So he is supposed to have knowledge...

...to disprove it. And, generally, it may be stated, as a rule on this subject, that when a purchaser cannot make out a title but by a deed which leads him to another fact, he shall be presumed to have knowledge of that fact. And see Jackson vs. Hoffman, 9 Cow....